Introduction
The maximum principle is a statement about holomorphic functions from the Complex Analysis. The magnitude
of a holomorphic function
cannot attain any strict local maxima within the domain of definition. Specifically, it asserts the following statement.
Statement
Let
be a domain, and let
be holomorphic. If
has a local maximum in
, then
is constant.
If
is bounded and
can be continuously extended to
, then
attains its maximum on
.
To prove this, we require a lemma that locally implies the conclusion.
Lemma
Let
be open, and
be holomorphic. Let
be a local maximum point of
. Then
is constant in a neighborhood of
.
Proof of Lemma 1
Let
be chosen such that
for all
. The Cauchy's integral formula'gives, for all
:

This allows us to establish the following estimation:
Proof of Lemma 2
We derive the following estimation:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{rl}|f(z_{0})|&={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\left|\int _{\partial D_{\varepsilon }(z_{0})}{\frac {f(z)}{z-z_{0}}}\,dz\right|\\&={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\left|\int _{0}^{2\pi }{\frac {f(z_{0}+\varepsilon e^{it})}{\varepsilon \cdot e^{it}}}\varepsilon \cdot i\cdot e^{it}\,dt\right|\\&\leq {\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{2\pi }|f(z_{0}+\varepsilon \cdot e^{it})|\,dt\\&\leq \sup _{t\in [0,2\pi ]}|f(z_{0}+\varepsilon \cdot e^{it})|\\&\leq |f(z_{0})|\end{array}}}](../71530d7f8f3c186c95ee9613c44851dd1cfe1c73.svg)
Proof of Lemma 3
It follows that the inequality
must be an equality chain, implying
.
Proof of Lemma 4
Thus, we establish the constancy of
using the property:
for all
,
i.e.,
is constant on
.
Proof of Lemma 5
If
is constant on
, then
must also be constant, where
is a constant.
Proof of Lemma 6
Since
is holomorphic on
, the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation'apply:
,
and the following holds:
.
Proof of Lemma 7
Let
and
. Applying the chain rule to the partial derivatives, we obtain:
and
.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation', replace the partial derivatives of
with those of
:
and
, leading to:
and
.
Proof of Lemma 8
Squaring the above equations yields:
,
.
Adding these equations gives:
.
Proof of Lemma 9
Factoring out
and
:
.
Thus,
or
.
Proof of Lemma 10
With
, it follows that
since
and
are real-valued, implying
.
If
, then
, and
. By the Cauchy-Riemann-Differential equation,
.
Thus,
is constant on
.
Proof
Let
be a local maximum point of
in the domain
. Define
as the set of all
mapped to
(level set).
Proof 1: V is closed
Since
is continuous, preimages of open sets are open, and preimages of closed sets are closed (in the relative topology of
). Thus,
is closed in
.
Proof 2: V is open
Using the lemma,
can also be represented as a union of open disks, and unions of open sets are open.
Proof 3: Connectivity
Thus,
due to the connectivity of
, i.e.,
is constant.
Proof 4: G is bounded
If
is bounded, then
is compact. Therefore, the continuous function
attains its maximum on
, say at
. If
, then
is constant on
(by the lemma) and hence on
, so
also attains its maximum on
. Otherwise,
, completing the proof.
See Also
Page Information
You can display this page as
Wiki2Reveal slides
Wiki2Reveal
TheWiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis'
and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.
Translation and Version Control
This page was translated based on the following source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:
https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Maximumprinzip