Statement
It is
an area,
holomorphic. If
is constant to
, then
is constant.
Proof
It is open
,
holomorphic. Other
constant.
Proof of Lemmas 1
If
is constant to
, then also
must be constant with a constant
. If
is constant, the partial derivation
and
.
Proof of the Lemmas 2
Because of
holomorphic on
the Cauchy-Riemannschen equations apply to

and

Proof of the Lemmas 3
If
and
and application of the chain rule to the partial derivations are obtained the two equations
and 
With CR-DGL
and
, the partial derivation of
is replaced by partial derivations of
and obtained (factor 2 can be omitted):
and 
Proof of the Lemmas 4
We square the two equations


and add these two squared equations to:

Proof of the Lemmas 5
Clamping
and
gives:

This follows with the real-value component or Imaginary part functions in the product:

Proof of the Lemmas 6
and
are real-valued and with
the only option to fulfill the equation is
i.e.
and
. This implies that
is constant with
.
- Similar to the argument above
implies
for the partial derivatives and
. With the application of the Cauchy-Riemann Equations and 
- for
.
In both cases
is constant on
.
See also
Page Information
You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides
Wiki2Reveal
The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.
Translation and Version Control
This page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity: