| Authors
|
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z &
|
|
| Penfield, Wilder (1975). The Mystery of the Mind : A Critical Study of Consciousness and the Human Brain. Princeton University Press, 1975. ISBN 0-691-02360-3
|
Authors
Excerpts
Reviews
Chronology
- Literature/1979/Bateson [^]
- Eccles, John (1979). The Human Mystery (The Gifford Lectures 1977-1978), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979. [^]
- Literature/1979/Hofstadter [^]
- Literature/1979/McNeill [^]
- Ortony, Andrew, ed. (1979). Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press. 2nd. ed. 1993. [^]
- Literature/1978/Vygotsky [^]
- Literature/1977/Blackmore [^]
- Popper, Karl and Eccles, John (1977). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Routledge, 1983. [^]
- Literature/1977/Schank [^]
- Literature/1976/Jayne [^]
- Literature/1975/Bandler [^]
- Fodor, Jerry (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press. [^]
- Literature/1975/Gardner [^]
- Literature/1975/MacKay [^]
- Literature/1975/Norman [^]
- Penfield, Wilder (1975). The Mystery of the Mind : A Critical Study of Consciousness and the Human Brain. Princeton University Press, 1975. ISBN 0-691-02360-3
Notes
|
|
1900s category ^
|
| '00
|
'01
|
'02
|
'03
|
'04
|
'05
|
'06
|
'07
|
'08
|
'09
|
| '10
|
'11
|
'12
|
'13
|
'14
|
'15
|
'16
|
'17
|
'18
|
'19
|
| '20
|
'21
|
'22
|
'23
|
'24
|
'25
|
'26
|
'27
|
'28
|
'29
|
| '30
|
'31
|
'32
|
'33
|
'34
|
'35
|
'36
|
'37
|
'38
|
'39
|
| '40
|
'41
|
'42
|
'43
|
'44
|
'45
|
'46
|
'47
|
'48
|
'49
|
| '50
|
'51
|
'52
|
'53
|
'54
|
'55
|
'56
|
'57
|
'58
|
'59
|
| '60
|
'61
|
'62
|
'63
|
'64
|
'65
|
'66
|
'67
|
'68
|
'69
|
| '70
|
'71
|
'72
|
'73
|
'74
|
'75
|
'76
|
'77
|
'78
|
'79
|
| '80
|
'81
|
'82
|
'83
|
'84
|
'85
|
'86
|
'87
|
'88
|
'89
|
| '90
|
'91
|
'92
|
'93
|
'94
|
'95
|
'96
|
'97
|
'98
|
'99
|
| 2000s category
|
| '00
|
'01
|
'02
|
'03
|
'04
|
'05
|
'06
|
'07
|
'08
|
'09
|
| '10
|
'11
|
'12
|
'13
|
'14
|
'15
|
'16
|
'17
|
'18
|
'19
|
|
|
|
|
http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
|
| The shade of the bar looks invariant in isolation but variant in context, in (favor of) sharp contrast with the color gradient background, hence an innate illusion we have to reasonably interpret and overcome as well as the mirage. Such variance appearing seasonably from context to context may not only be the case with our vision but worldview in general in practice indeed, whether a priori or a posteriori. Perhaps no worldview from nowhere, without any point of view or prejudice at all!
Ogden & Richards (1923) said, "All experience ... is either enjoyed or interpreted ... or both, and very little of it escapes some degree of interpretation."
H. G. Wells (1938) said, "The human individual is born now to live in a society for which his fundamental instincts are altogether inadequate."
|